Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine - Martha M. Grout, MD, MD(H)
LOCATION and CONTACT
-
MARTHA GROUT MD MD(H) 
-
LIBRARY
-
APPROACHES TO HEALTH
-
HEALTH EVALUATION
-
ABOUT INSURANCE
-
RECOMMENDED LINKS
-
SEARCH THE SITE
-
HOMEPAGE
-

-
Your Health is Our Commitment

Health in the News

FDA approves Irradiating spinach, lettuce to kill germs

August 2008

The government will allow food producers to start zapping fresh spinach and iceberg lettuce with radiation beginning August 22, 2008.

The FDA ruled that irradiation can kill food-poisoning germs and lengthen the greens' shelf life without compromising the safety or nutrient value of raw spinach and lettuce.

Irradiated spices and meat have been around for years, particularly ground beef that is a favorite hiding spot for E. coli.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association had originally petitioned the FDA seeking to expand use of irradiation to many more types of produce several years ago. But in wake of the 2006 E. coli outbreak from spinach — which killed three people and sickened nearly 200 — plus a list of lettuce recalls, the industry group asked the FDA to rule on the leafy greens first.

The FDA still is considering what other types of produce might be irradiated. Often mentioned as possibilities are tomatoes and peppers, which have been the focus of investigators trying to trace this summer's nationwide salmonella outbreak.

E. coli is fairly sensitive to radiation, but salmonella can require more energy. While it's not sterilization, the FDA ruled that food companies could use a dose proven to dramatically reduce levels of E. coli, salmonella and listeria on raw spinach and lettuce — a dose somewhat lower than meat requires.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Rather than clean up the commercial feedlot practices which contribute mightily to the down steam flow of E.coli, salmonella, antibiotics and other contaminants, the FDA is voting to "sterilize" our vegetables. For those who enjoy the benefits of raw spinach and other vegetables, it won't be raw anymore when it has been irradiated. The delicate enzymes and nutrients that make raw food so valuable will be "zapped away" along with the potential germs.

irradiated food symbolOrganic food is supposed to be exempt from irradiation. Food which has been irradiated is supposed to carry a little sign that looks completely innocuous, like a flower.


Lily to buy Monsanto's rBGH growth hormone

August 2008

Eli Lilly announced August 20th that it would pay $300 million for global rights to Posilac, the widely used Monsanto Co artificial hormone to boost milk production. The deal is expected to close near the beginning of the fourth quarter, Lilly said.

Monsanto has battled with consumer activists for more than a decade over whether Posilac, also known as rBGH or rbST, is harmful to human and animal health. The debate has heated up over the past two years, as a growing number of dairy and food companies have demanded that milk be free of Posilac.

Lilly said Posilac would expand its line of animal health products, provide dairy farmers more options and give consumers affordable choices.

"We remain focused on the health and care of the cow in working with farmers to increase global milk supply," Lilly said in a release.

"Eli Lilly is not helping its shareholders by buying a product that the marketplace is already abandoning," said Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter. "Consumers don't want to drink milk produced with artificial hormones, retailers don't want to sell it and fewer and fewer dairy farmers are using it."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Kroger Co, one of the nation's largest retail grocery chains, said last year it was rejecting the synthetic hormone. So too has Wal-Mart, Starbucks and Dean Foods. And for more than a decade the European Union also has rejected imports of meat derived from hormone-treated cattle.

Consumer pressure to stop the use of this hormone reflects a growing concern among parents that it is better to be safe than sorry.

Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., has been on the forefront of the battle to cease the use of this synthetic hormone. In his book, What's In Your Milk?, he makes 3 key points: rBGH milk is supercharged with high levels of a natural growth factor (IGF-1) which is readily absorbed through the gut. Excess levels of IGF-1 have been incriminated as a cause of breast, colon, and prostate cancers. And IGF-1 blocks natural defense mechanisms against early submicroscopic cancers.

Arsenic in drinking water may increase diabetes

August 2008

According to a study published in the August 20th issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, "exposure to low levels of inorganic arsenic...in drinking water may increase a person's risk of type 2 diabetes,"

The new findings also follow recent studies on contaminants, including hormones and antibiotics, making their way into U.S. public tap water. But, while previous research showed chronic exposure to high levels of arsenic could lead to diabetes, this new report is the first to show that even levels that meet U.S. regulations may be dangerous. To conduct their study, "researchers analyzed data from the 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationwide health study that, for the first time, collected and tested arsenic levels in urine."

The researchers, led by Ana Navas-Acien, M.D., Ph.D., an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, found that participants with type 2 diabetes had a 26 percent higher level of total arsenic in their urine than those without the disease.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Scientists have long known that arsenic is linked to cancer. And now we see evidence of its contribution to the obesity epidemic. With this kind of information getting into the mainstream news, it is harder to ignore that toxicity in our environment can have a huge impact on our health. Arsenic was associated with development of type II diabetes as early as the 1950s, when a patient was given IV arsenic for a sexually transmitted disease. Two primary sources of arsenic: non-organic chicken and groundwater naturally contaminated with arsenic – and heavy metals.

We are capable of eliminating the body burden of toxins and heavy metals. Perhaps the refusal of the medical establishment to consider therapy, and the refusal of the insurance establishment to cover the cost of reducing the body burden, is at least partly responsible for rising health care costs. The epidemic of diabetes goes hand-in-hand with higher rates of heart disease, strokes, amputations, and disability. At the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine, we provide detox therapies and chelation.

FDA claims BPA in plastics is safe

August 2008

On Aug. 15, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said in a draft report that "bisphenol A, as used in those products, is not dangerous." The products referred to include unbreakable water bottles and cans made to hold food.

The Washington Post reported the next day that the FDA's finding "stands in contrast to more than 100 studies performed by government scientists and university laboratories that have found health concerns associated with bisphenol A (BPA). Some studies have linked the chemical to prostate and breast cancers, diabetes, behavioral disorders such as hyperactivity, and reproductive problems in laboratory animals."

Pete Myers, chief scientist for Environmental Health Sciences, said the FDA "disregarded recent studies of bisphenol's effects included in the National Toxicology Program's April draft report."

Meanwhile, the American Chemistry Council welcomed the findings of the new report.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
The FDA's finding is based largely on the strength of two industry-funded studies that found no problems. This underscores what many critics have said is an all too cozy relationship between the FDA and the industries it is supposed to regulate.

But consumers would rather be safe than sorry. Several retailers, including Wal-Mart and Toys R' Us, announced that they were phasing out baby bottles that used BPA. I've seen "BPA-free" water bottles now at REI sporting goods stores.

FDA orders Cipro warning

July 2008

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ordered drug manufacturers to add a stronger black-box warning label to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. The new labels must highlight the increased risk of tendonitis and tendon rupture for people using the drugs.

According to a July 8, 2008 FDA statement, the agency analyzed available literature and postmarketing reports of adverse events. Their latest research confirmed that use of fluoroquinolone is associated with an increased risk of tendon rupture.

And despite the current label warnings regarding possible tendon rupture—the agency continues to receive numerous reports of tendon-related adverse events.

"Fluoroquinolones are effective in treating certain bacterial infections, but health care professionals and patients need to be aware of the increased risk associated with the use of these drugs of developing tendonitis and tendon rupture, particularly for certain patient populations," said Edward Cox, M.D., director of the Office of Antimicrobial Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

People over 60 years of age have an increased risk of developing tendonitis and tendon rupture associated with the use of fluoroquinolone. The risk also increases for kidney, heart, and lung transplant recipients, and for people taking corticosteroid drugs.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
When we are dying, antibiotics are a good choice to debulk the infection so that the body can deal with the clean-up. But the casual use of antibiotics has led to the growth of "superbugs." And all pharmaceutical drugs carry risk. We think we know the effects of drugs, but their effects have not tested on every metabolic process in the body. Only "post-marketing" reports will reveal some of these side effects, which may well turn out to be affecting essential metabolic processes as we have found out with Cipro.

Monsanto gives up on rBGH hormone in milk

August 2008

Monsanto announced it is putting up for sale the division that produces bovine growth hormone, also known as rBGH or rBST.

Monsanto's Chrissie Chavis told reporters that Posilac, as it's known commercially, is a "solid successful product of significant value to dairy farmers."

BGHBut nationwide a growing number of consumers and dairy processors have felt otherwise. The Cancer Prevention Coalition's Dr. Sam Epstein says that the IGF-1 from rBGH treated milk is "supercharged" and can lead to an increased number of cancers in humans. Consumers Union cites that elevated mastitis rates among treated cows leads to additional antibiotic treatment in the animal.

In the last several years, major retailers such as Safeway and Kroger have decided to ban the artificial hormone in their store-brand milk. Starbucks has refused to purchase dairy from treated cows at its company-operated stores. Chipotle Mexican Grill has banned rBST in its company stores. In January, Kraft Foods announced it would offer a line of cheese made with rBGH-free milk. Dean Foods, the largest U.S. dairy company. now offers a line of rBST-free products.

Monsanto refused to divulge sales figures, but insists that one-third of the nation's cows receive injections of the growth hormone which boosts milk production.

Has pressure from consumers led to Monsanto's decision? Monsanto's Chrissie Chavis denies it. "Our core focus is in the seeds and trace business. Since 1994 it's (Posilac) been a very strong product for us. We've sold more doses this year than we sold last year. We see significant opportunity in the future in the U.S. as well as the international markets."

The company plans to continue sales outside of the country, particularly Mexico and Brazil. rBGH is approved for use in 20 countries, says the Monsanto spokesperson, although it is banned in all of Europe, Japan, Australia and other industrialized countries, with the exception of the U.S.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This is being called a major victory for consumers. However, it is interesting to note how Monsanto is positioning its products in this time of high global food prices. Spokesperson Chavis positioned the new face of Posilac as a "green" alternative for farmers, saying the drug allows big savings in terms of feed and land.

"As the environmental pressure on agriculture gets greater, this allows dairy producers to produce more milk with less (sic) cows thereby reducing the overall carbon footprint of milk production," Chavis said.

Meanwhile, Monsanto is going to focus even harder on genetically modified foods which many of us physicians feel represents a huge threat to human health.

More than half of the U.S. soybeans and corn that make up roughly 70 percent of pre-packages grocery store items come from genetically engineered ingredients. Recently, rBGH has been tested on catfish and tilapia to increase growth.

More chemicals approved for our environment

August 2008

A New York Times editorial on August 4th says the U.S. Department of Labor "has shirked its responsibility to upgrade workplace safety. In seven years, it has issued but one major rule change protecting workers against a chemical toxin — and that was forced on it by court order. Now, it's taken a giant step beyond benign neglect. Political appointees at the agency have been discovered in a rush to duck public disclosure and jimmy into place a pro-industry rule making it more difficult to limit workers' exposure to poisonous chemicals."

The Washington Post brought the matter to light when it got curious about a brief, nine-word reference on a White House Web site. It turned out to be a proposal to weaken existing toxin risk standards by adding more opportunities to challenge rules, a change sought by industry. It also would water down the current standard of measuring accumulated toxin risk across a work career of 45 years.

"This is flat-out secrecy," said Peg Seminario, director of health and safety policy at the AFL=CIO. "They are trying to essentially change the job safety and health laws and reduce required workplace protections through a midnight regulation." Seminario said she was stunned that the administration would consider the rule its top priority, when for years it has "slow-walked and stalled" safety rules that would reduce worker deaths and injuries from diacetyl and beryllium. "It signals that the regulatory mess facing the next president continues to grow, since the stealth games at Labor are likely being duplicated in other agencies," the Times concluded.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
The medical community is becoming increasingly aware of the damage chemicals do to human health, and Environmental Working Group has documented what is inside all of us, the "body burden." This event demonstrates the need for us to rely less on government agencies to protect us, and to rely more on self-education. An excellent new book I recommend is The Autoimmune Epidemic by Donna Jackson Nakawzawa. This particular book got attention from homeopathic and holistic physicians because it looks at the linkages between environmental contaminants and the rise in all manner of autoimmune diseases. The book got endorsements from head people at the National Institutes of Health and John Hopkins – both mainstream organizations.

Bigger meals add up to bigger bodies

August 2008

The New York Times reports that in 1970, the average American ate about 16.4 pounds of food a week. By 2006, the average intake grew by an additional 1.8 pounds a week.

"Among other things, that's an extra half pound of fat weekly - mostly from oils and shortening. That doesn't count the fat in the extra quarter pound of meat Americans now eat every seven days. Those fats were somewhat offset by a steep drop in dairy consumption, the only major food group to have a decline, primarily in milk drinking."

This data was compiled from the U.S. Agriculture Department's 2006 "food availability" - the amount of food produced for the average American consumer after losses are factored in.

"The overall increase in eating does suggest a link with the rise in Americans' weight over the same period. According to the Centers for Disease Control, 15 percent of adults age 20 to 74 were obese by 1980. By 2007, that had more than doubled."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Fat is not necessarily a bad thing. We need fat for energy, hormone production, cellular membranes, organ padding, and certain saturated fatty acids are also needed for important cellular signaling and stabilization processes in the body.

But as this data points out, we've increased consumption of the "bad" fats – vegetable oils and hydrogenated oils (trans fats) which harden cell walls and make them less able to take nutrients in and let out metabolic waste – toxins.

Good fats and fish oils need to be in our diet. And nutrition writers would do well to have a better understanding of naturally-occurring saturated fat found in grass-fed red meat that mankind has eaten for centuries. It has no strong links with disease, while industrially produced trans fats do. I stress grass-fed because healthy red meat, eggs and come from animals fed their natural diet. Unhealthy saturated fat comes from grain fed animals.

Our nurses use FirstLine Therapy to help our patients separate the nutrition hype from reality and learn how to eat good foods that the whole family will enjoy. Want to live without chronic disease? Let us teach you how to build a strong foundation with every bite you take.

New labels for sunscreens

August 2008

A senate bill introduced August 1 would compel the Food and Drug Administration to make final comprehensive rules on sunscreen.

Senator Christopher J. Dodd, (D-CT), said the FDA appeared to be moving at a deliberately slow pace for the benefit of sunscreen manufacturers. "The delay is happening for economic reasons," Senator Dodd said. "The F.D.A. knows better. It sounds like an industry reluctant to have a standard set because that may open the doors to insisting upon more accurate labels on certain other products as well."

Since 1978, sunscreens have used the SPF numbering system to rate protection against sunburn caused by the sun's shorter-wavelength ultraviolet B rays.

The new sunscreen rules would require manufacturers to test the efficacy of the products against the sun's longer-wavelength ultraviolet A rays, which also can damage skin. Sunscreen labels would be required to display both the familiar SPF number and a new rating for UVA protection.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
I think this misses the bigger picture. The amount of information coming out about the benefits of Vitamin D – the sunshine vitamin – is virtually snowballing. We have escalating rates of cancer and chronic disease, and studies show that low levels of vitamin D is to partly blame.

Because people have been told to fear the sun, there is a widespread vitamin D deficiency today. About 90 percent of the vitamin D in your body is made when your skin is exposed to sunlight. This bill also does not address the sunscreen toxicity issue. A March 2008 study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control revealed that 97% of Americans are contaminated with a widely-used sunscreen ingredient called oxybenzone that has been linked to allergies, hormone disruption, and cell damage.

FDA to regulate cancer-causing cigarettes?

July 2008

The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a bill that would give the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products. The bill still has to be approved by the Senate and the President.

The show of support in the House, which passed the bill by a vote of 326 to 102, illustrated not only the strength of antismoking sentiment in the country but the benefit of enlisting a powerful ally. The legislation was partly the result of negotiations with Philip Morris USA, the nation's largest cigarette company, which split with other companies by endorsing it.

Most large public health groups supported the measure, including the American Lung Association, but some antismoking advocates said the bargain struck with Philip Morris gave too many concessions to industry.

The bill specifically states that the F.D.A.'s new powers would stop short of the ability to order the elimination of nicotine from tobacco products or place an outright ban on all tobacco products.

The agency could reduce nicotine to nonaddictive levels if it determined that doing so would benefit public health. The bill bans flavored cigarettes that appeal to young people but exempts menthol from that ban. The bill requires cigarette makers to provide detailed disclosure about the type and quantities of ingredients in their products — like ammonia and acetaldehyde — which are believed to work with nicotine to increase the addictiveness of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. The requirements mean that companies would be required to disclose internal research on the biological effects of those additives.

If the legislation is enacted, consumers would see a wholesale revamping of the warning labels on tobacco products. The current warning message would be replaced by graphic images of the physical ravages often caused by cigarettes, such as lung tumors and mouth growths.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This bill would put the FDA in the interesting position of approving the sale of something that kills people and has no medical benefit. According to the CDC, tobacco kills 438,000 people each year in the United States alone. According to conservative figures from the American Medical Association, FDA-approved drugs kill about 100,000 Americans a year. By contrast, 2751 people died in the 9-11 World Trade Center tragedy.

The White House is promising to veto the legislation because "the bill will unfortunately undermine one of the nation's premier public health and regulatory institutions and potentially lead the public to mistakenly conclude some tobacco products are safe." Meanwhile, Barack Obama promises a national ban on smoking in public places.

Politics aside, one thing is for sure. The FDA is undermanned and unable to protect the public health as it is. FDA-approved Vioxx killed 60,000 people and headlines about salmonella in tomatoes and e.coli in the beef just keep coming.

Are Pediatricians Industry Shills?

Writing in the San Francisco Chronicle, author and pediatrician Lawrence Diller paints a chilling picture of how so many children came to be on behavior modifying prescription drugs.

"Most parents have never heard of him, but Joseph Biederman of Harvard may be the United States' most influential doctor when it comes to determining whether their children are normal or mentally ill," Diller wrote. "The science of children's psychiatric medications is so primitive and Biederman's influence so great that when he merely mentions a drug during a presentation, tens of thousands of children within a year or two will end up taking that drug, or combination of drugs. This happens in the absence of a drug trial of any kind…

"That's why Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley's recent revelation that Biederman did not declare $1.6 million in drug company consulting fees is so important, scary and tragic … drug company money is corrupting medical practice and the maintenance of our country's health."

Diller explains that the $1.6 million that Biederman didn't declare is only a small fraction of the full amount of research funding that his clinic receives from nearly a dozen companies that pay for not only the cost of running studies but also the salaries of the doctors involved. "Virtually all doctors who receive drug company money say they are not influenced, but every independent study examining the effects of such money says they are."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Dr. Lawrence Diller is the author of "The Last Normal Child" (Praeger, 2006). He is to be applauded for bringing attention to the gross conflicts of interests which now permeate standard medicine. These conflicts are hidden from American public by an unquestioning media.

Many times Dr. Paul Offit for example been quoted as an expert doctor when it comes to vaccines, yet rarely does the news mention that he is a paid consultant to Merck Pharmaceuticals who makes vaccines.

Dr. Diller's essay is excellent and can be found in its entirely at http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/13/IN7G11L6TL.DTL

Also see our recent news item on the American Academy of Pediatrics recommending cholesterol lowering drugs for children beginning at age 8.

Inappropriate childhood behavior ranging from aggressiveness to autism, from inability to focus to severe stomach pains is our specialty. Read how we examine the whole body – from brain function to gut function and everything in between – and how we apply non-drug based answers at http://www.arizonaadvancedmedicine.com/therapies/brain_advantage.html

Secret Toxic Laundry Products

A University of Washington study of six top-selling laundry products and air fresheners found they all gave off at least one chemical regulated as toxic or hazardous, but none of those chemicals was listed on the product labels.

"People were telling me that the air fresheners in public restrooms and the scent from laundry products vented outdoors were making them sick," said Anne Steinemann, a UW professor of civil and environmental engineering and of public affairs. She analyzed the products to discover the chemicals' identity.

"I was surprised by both the number and the potential toxicity of the chemicals that were found," Steinemann said. Chemicals included acetone, the active ingredient in paint thinner and nail-polish remover; limonene, a molecule with a citrus scent; and acetaldehyde, chloromethane and 1,4-dioxane.

"Nearly 100 volatile organic compounds were emitted from these six products, and none were listed on any product label. Plus, five of the six products emitted one or more carcinogenic 'hazardous air pollutants,' which are considered by the EPA to have no safe exposure level," Steinemann said.

Her study was published online July 23 by the journal Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Steinemann chose not to disclose the brand names of the six products she tested. In a larger study of 25 cleaners, personal care products, air fresheners and laundry products, now submitted for publication, she found that many other brands contained similar chemicals.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Manufacturers of consumer products are not required to disclose the ingredients The European Union recently enacted legislation requiring products to list 26 fragrance chemicals when they are present above a certain concentration in cosmetic products and detergents. No similar laws exist in the United States.

If we had better in truth in labeling, we wouldn't be in the dark about toxic chemicals in our environment.

FDA funding increases despite complaints of incompetence

July 2008

For the second year in a row legislators have scolded the Food and Drug Administration for doling out most of its bonus money to top managers instead of field inspectors.

President Bush signed an Iraq war spending bill into law June 30th that also included an extra $150 million for the FDA to hire more staff and conduct more food inspections.

Meanwhile, a House Energy and Commerce Committee report said "retention" bonuses were created to keep coveted field inspectors, analysts and scientists from ditching the federal government for greener paychecks at private sector posts. But most of the money has ended up in the hands of upper-level management, the report said.

The House committee issued a similar report criticizing the FDA in 2007.

By way of example, the FDA's chief of regulatory affairs received $48,663 in bonuses last year—more than half the salary of the average federal employee, according to the committee report.

The Western Growers Association has asked Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Calif, to seek a congressional investigation of the FDA's handling of the tomato recall. The group sees the singling out of tomatoes as part of a trend in which the FDA puts out information too quickly to merely quash public panic.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
I give a big thumbs up to the words of Committee Chairman John Dingell, D-Mich, who called the FDA's funding distribution pattern a "failure of FDA management to understand that its sole purpose for existence is to protect the American people."

FDA Admits Mercury Fillings May Be Unsafe

June 2008

In a dramatic reversal, the FDA has modified its long-standing assertion that mercury in dental fillings is completely harmless. This comes in the wake of a class-action lawsuit settlement in June.

Amalgam fillings have a silver color and are made of about 50 percent mercury. Toxic mercury vapors are released into the mouth and absorbed by the body as people chew and drink liquids.

During a several hour negotiation session in the case of Moms Against Mercury et al. v. Von Eschenbach, Commissioner, et al., the FDA agreed to change its website on amalgams.

Gone are all of FDA's claims that no science exists that amalgam is unsafe, or that other countries have acted for environmental reasons only, or that the 2006 Scientific Panel vote affirmed amalgam's safety.

FDA now website now states: "Dental amalgams contain mercury, which may have neurotoxic effects on the nervous systems of developing children and fetus … Pregnant women and persons who may have a health condition that makes them more sensitive to mercury exposure, including individuals with existing high levels of mercury bioburden, should not avoid seeking dental care, but should discuss options with their health practitioner."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
It is interesting to note that the American Dental Association however is still standing firm, saying amalgam is: "a safe, affordable and durable material that has been used in the teeth of more than 100 million Americans." And since the FDA is not restricting the use of amalgam, dentists' offices are not prohibited from using amalgam fillings.

This should have been a no-brainer. We do not need mercury, one of the most lethal metals on earth, in our mouths. Many feel that the federal agency charged with the responsibility of safe guarding the health and welfare of the American public shirked that duty. The FDA's change in policy came after a tremendous amount of advocacy – petitions, Congressional hearings, Scientific Advisory Committee hearings, support letters, and finally, a class action lawsuit.

Chelation therapy for autistic kids called "Fringe"

July 2008

An AP article reprinted in the Arizona Republic said use of chelation with autistic children "is a move some scientists see as an unethical experiment in voodoo medicine. The treatment removes heavy metals from the body and is based on the fringe theory that mercury in vaccines triggers autism – a theory never proved and rejected my mainstream science."

The article relates the story of a boy named Charlie who started chelation at 5 and three weeks later "looked at (his mom) and waved and gave a thumbs-up sign and walked into school. All the moms who had been watching burst into tears (of joy)." The writer said there was no way to prove whether chelation made a difference or whether Charlie simply adjusted to the school routine.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This article so moved me I fired off a letter to the editor at the Republic. It says, in part, "How can I take seriously an article written as though it were "news", when even the headline contains emotionally charged words aimed at steering the reader toward the writer's opinion? In medicine, informed consent involves presenting the facts to patients, discussing the pros and cons, and allowing them to make their own decisions about whether to undergo the proposed treatment. We try very hard not to say that ours is the only way, that other ways are "quackery".

Medical history is full of cases where those who, early on saw value in new ways, were at first ridiculed, then later awarded the Nobel Prize. Linus Pauling of vitamin C fame is one such example. In the case of chelation's use in autism, the writer miserably failed to present both sides of the story.

Chelation is a proven therapy. It was used by the U.S. Navy to successfully remove lead from poisoned sailors and has been used since successfully to treat heart disease. This is not a "fringe" treatment. It is a tried and true treatment now being applied to children because studies show children's bodies are loaded with metals and environmental chemicals.

Of course, parents of autistic children are desperate. An estimated 1 in 150 children now has autism. Conventional medicine, as the article points out, says there is no cure and offers a few prescription drugs. If chelation can bring autistic children back into the world, then the media deserves to give it an honest look and stop merely repeating old dogma. Here at the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine, autistic children use chelation often with great success and we celebrate those successes.

Statin Drugs Recommended for Kids

July 2008

The nation's pediatricians are recommending wider cholesterol screening for children and more aggressive use of cholesterol-lowering drugs starting as early as the age of 8 in hopes of preventing adult heart problems.

New guidelines issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) are a push to aggressively screen and medicate children for high cholesterol. The recommendations call for cholesterol screening of children and adolescents, starting as early as the age of 2 and no later than the age of 10, if they come from families with a history of high cholesterol or heart attacks before 55 for men and 65 for women.

Proponents say there is growing evidence that the first signs of heart disease show up in childhood, and with 30 percent of the nation's children overweight or obese, many doctors fear that a rash of early heart attacks and diabetes is on the horizon as these children grow up.

Dr. Jatinder Bhatia, a member of the academy's nutrition committee, said that although there was not "a whole lot" of data on pediatric use of cholesterol-lowering drugs, recent research showed that the drugs were generally safe for children.

Surprisingly, the paper published in the medical journal Pediatrics that explains the new guidelines notes that among adolescents, average total cholesterol levels as well as LDL and HDL cholesterol have remained stable, while triglyceride levels have dropped, based on data collected from 1988 to 2000.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This is another curious recommendation from the AAP. Statins have been around since only the mid-1980s; there is no evidence to show whether giving statins to a child will lower the risk for heart attack in middle age. Despite Dr. Bhatia's breezy endorsement of these drugs, there is evidence that statins cause muscle pain and weakness, and interfere with the mental ability to concentrate and think clearly.

Decades ago, a few studies caused the medical world to think high cholesterol is linked to heart disease. We know now those studies were flawed. We also now know enough that before we prescribe drugs for young children that alter the body's basic processes, we should first look at whether "high" cholesterol is caused perhaps by low thyroid, exposure to chlorine, lack of sun exposure, lack of vitamin c, or hydrogenated oils in the diet.

The AAP also recommends giving children low-fat milk after 12 months if a doctor is concerned about future weight problems. The AAP says that because children often consume so much fat, low-fat milk is now appropriate. Truth is, children absolutely need fat - and cholesterol - for brain development.

But too many kids eat the wrong kids of fats, trans fatty acids from fast foods. What kids need more than anything is DHA, especially when they are very young, to build up their brain function and neural connections. Mother's milk has the highest levels of DHA. It would be a shame to deprive toddlers and growing children of the most helpful part of cow's milk - the full fat - in the mistaken belief that high cholesterol levels are the cause of heart disease.

Vitamins May Rescue Defective Genes

June 2008

Science Daily reports that the cost of mapping your genes may drop to $100 per person in five years. "Soon the only reason not to look at your 'personal genome' will be fear of what bad news lies in your genes."

University of California, Berkeley scientists, however, have found a welcome reason to delve into your genetic heritage: to find the slight genetic flaws that can be fixed with remedies as simple as vitamin or mineral supplements.

The researchers' report in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) is that there are many genetic differences that make people's enzymes less efficient than normal, and that simple supplementation with vitamins can often restore some of these deficient enzymes to full working order.

"Our studies have convinced us that there is a lot of variation in the population in these enzymes, and a lot of it affects function, and a lot of it is responsive to vitamins," said researcher Nicholas Marini. "I wouldn't be surprised if everybody is going to require a different optimal dose of vitamins based on their genetic makeup, based upon the kind of variance they are harboring in vitamin-dependent enzymes."

Most scientists think that harmful mutations are disfavored by evolution, but research team member Jasper Rine pointed out this applies only to mutations that affect reproductive fitness. Mutations that affect our health in later years are not efficiently removed by evolution and may remain in our genome forever.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
There has been a lot of PR spin against the benefits of vitamins; it's good to see someone finally producing objective research that shows what we have all known for years. Of course vitamins are good for you, that is why Mother Nature's real food is chock full of them. It is encouraging to see that genetic defects have the potential to be corrected with appropriate supplementation.

We know that what you eat and are exposed to today will affect the DNA you pass down to you children and your grandchildren. To see how the whole science of inheritance is being turned on its head, check out this BBC-produced documentary called The Ghost In Your Genes.

Smoking – a bad habit or profitable disease?

June 2008

A recent article in the Annals of Medicine suggests that the smoking habit should be reclassified as a disease.

The authors say, "For smokers using long-term cessation medications, health care providers should encourage treatment and insurance carriers should cover it … Tobacco dependence treatments are often limited. Tobacco dependence should share the status of other chronic illnesses, with effective treatments given as long as is necessary to achieve successful clinical outcomes."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This is a fascinating, behind-the-scenes look at the maneuverings of the pharmaceutical industry to create an ever widening market for drugs in the United States. They are planting the idea that to quit smoking, you need prescription drugs and those should be paid for by health insurance because smoking is a chronic illness like diabetes.

The authors of this article declared conflicts of interest with the drug companies Pfizer, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Celtic Pharma.

Does "long-term cessation medications" mean that people will essentially transfer their addiction from the tobacco companies to the pharmaceutical industry? Studies have shown that existing medicinal nicotine substitutes are far from harmless. Buproprion, a common nicotine substitute, has been known to cause seizures. And the substitute varenceline has been linked to psychiatric disturbances including suicides.

CNN's Lou Dobbs blasts FDA's incompetence

June 2008

CNN reports the FDA office in charge of food safety has seen its workload increase more than 20 percent in recent years. But the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition has had its staffing and budget cut 14 percent from 2003 to 2006.

Most of the cuts came in the field, those in charge of inspecting the food consumers eat. The GAO says in 2001 there were 211 inspections of foreign food companies; last year only 96. But the problems for the agency date back even further.

The Department of Health and Human Services estimates that the current tomato outbreak will cost the national tomato industry more than 100 million. "Why did hundreds of people have to be sickened before the FDA acted?" asked CNN anchor Lou Dobbs. "The FDA doesn't know where the salmonella came from. The FDA doesn't have any positive evidence in a tomato of salmonella. They don't know anything about the distribution system; they don't know anything about the packing operations, the farms themselves, are only this weekend sending inspectors into the field. Now they're saying that this outbreak has its origins are in both Florida and Mexico? That defies credulity. I mean this is just unbelievable. Sheer brazen incompetence. And there still isn't any hard evidence that the salmonella is in the tomatoes. This salmonella outbreak underscores the FDA's utter inability to protect the American consuming public."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
When the FDA's advisory panels are filled with conflicts of interest, filled with people who have various ties with the industry, the agency cannot expect to operate in the public interest.

We've seen prior problems with tomatoes, we've had the e. coli scare in the spinach field, we've had to recall tons of beef…. The food is recalled, or we are told to cook it longer. But no where is there a call to change industry farming methods which encourage the growth of e. coli and salmonella.

This voices of dissatisfaction with the FDA's mission to protect the public has moved beyond advocacy groups now to the mainstream media. It will be interesting to see how the next presidential administration handles this hot potato.

MSG to be reviewed by FDA

June 2008

After decades of concern about the safety of the food additive MSG in food, and mounting evidence about the adverse reactions many people have to it, the FDA is considering a petition to remove monosodium glutamate from the GRAS (generally regarded as safe) list of ingredients.

This action would stop hundreds of food manufacturers, from Campbell's to Heinz, and thousands of restaurants, from Kentucky Fired Chicken to Applebees, from using this additive.

Since 1950, food manufacturers and restaurants have discovered that adding MSG to food makes people eat more of it, and eat more quickly. MSG is addictive, like nicotine for food.

The petition says: "There are few chemicals that we are exposed to that have as many far reaching physiological affects on living beings as Monosodium Glutamate does. MSG directly causes obesity, diabetes, triggers epilepsy, destroys eye tissues, is genotoxic in many organs and is the probable cause of ADHD and Autism. Considering that MSG's only reported role in food is that of `flavor enhancer' is that use worth the risk of the myriad of physical ailments associated with it? Does the public really want to be tricked into eating more food and faster by a food additive? MSG is entering our bodies in record amounts with absolutely no limits."

The use of MSG has become controversial in the past 30 years because of adverse reactions in people who've eaten foods that contain MSG. Research on the role of glutamate--a group of chemicals that includes MSG--in the nervous system also has raised questions about the chemical's safety.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
After WWII ended, the American military was curious to find out why the Japanese field rations tasted so much better. Turned out the secret ingredient was MSG, and that began the large-scale use of it in the United States. MSG makes our brain declare that food tastes really, really good and that we want more of it, regardless of nutritive value.

MSG simulates umami, one of the five basic tastes which the human tongue can recognize and appreciate. Specifically, umami is the taste associated with savoriness, as found in foods such as meat, cheese, tomatoes, and mushrooms. These foods contain naturally formed glutamates, which is what gives them that savory taste. Unfortunately, MSG, like aspartame, is also toxic to the brain.

MSG can be used without disclosure - you won't find it find it listed on the label. Instead, it might be called one of perhaps 50 names including hydrolyzed protein, soy protein, maltodextrin, or natural flavor. It might be in the milk solids in low fat milk. MSG is found in most soups, salad dressings, processed meats, frozen entrees, ice cream, and frozen yogurt, in some crackers, bread, canned tuna, and very often in "low fat" and "no fat" foods to make up for flavor lost when fat is reduced or eliminated. It can be found in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements and infant formula. It is found in vaccines -- including vaccines used on children. It can be used in waxes applied to fresh fruits and vegetables and it sprayed on vegetable crops and nuts in the fields. California wine grapes are sprayed with MSG.

You can read the petition at http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=FDA-2007-P-0178. You can also read Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock's book entitled, "Excitotoxins, The Taste That Kills."

Baby Boomers fuel "brain fitness" market

June 2008

Teenagers cramming for tests and people worried about "senior moments" can now turn to an explosion of brain-assisting video games, such as Nintendo's Brain Age; puzzles that are said to ward off dementia, such as Sudoku and crosswords; and online tips that claim to train the brain.

"This is not just a Nintendo-fueled fad," says Alvaro Fernandez, CEO & Co-Founder of SharpBrains, a market-research firm. "The brain fitness market passed a tipping point in 2007 thanks to the convergence of a very proactive boomer generation hitting their 60s."

Many boomers have watched their parents struggle with Alzheimers, and an estimated 10 million of them are now expected to develop the disease, according to a recent report from the Alzheimer's Association.

"People are worried," says Dr. John Hart Jr., medical science director of the Center for BrainHealth at the University of Texas at Dallas. "You have a large group of the population getting to the age where they are sort of vulnerable to degenerative neurological diseases that seem to be prevalent."

Hart says there is "reasonable evidence" that challenging your brain by learning new things can stave off the cognitive decline that comes with aging. But brain fitness programs differ from traditional learning by focusing on drills for specific cognitive abilities, such as concentration and retaining information.

"I am hoping that in the future, you will be able to go a health care provider or other expert who will be able to give folks a brain physical" and prescribe the proper exercises, he says.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
The future has arrived. At the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine we evaluate brain function as well as body function, through our BrainAdvantage™ program, and prescribe a program which will help improve memory, judgment and metabolism – all in one location. You no longer have to go to a traditional doctor for blood work, a holistic doctor or naturopath to look at functional tests, and a neuropsychologist to work with your brain. Now you can do it all at the same time, in the same place. Please call us for more information.

Heart surgery not linked to cognitive decline

June 2008

Heart patients often experience lasting problems with memory, language, and other cognitive skills after bypass surgery. However, these problems aren't caused by the surgery itself or the pump used to replace heart function during surgery, a new study by Johns Hopkins researchers suggests.

The study compared cognitive function of patients who received cardiac bypass surgery with that of patients who received other treatments for coronary artery disease, including pharmaceuticals and stents. After testing all the study subjects periodically in a variety of cognitive areas for six years after their treatments, the researchers found that both groups experienced an almost identical decline in cognitive function.

The results suggest that the disease itself, and not any particular treatment, is the cause for cognitive decline.

Previous studies linked bypass surgery to patients' mental decline. Many doctors blamed the bypass pump that keeps blood flowing through the body during surgery and therefore did not recommend surgery to their patients.

Hopkins researcher Guy McKhann says he and other researchers believe coronary artery disease is the culprit. However, he says, they don't believe cognitive decline is an inevitable consequence of heart disease.

"If we take a very aggressive approach to treating risk factors for heart disease, including keeping a handle on diabetes, blood pressure, and weight, patients may be able to avoid these cognitive problems," McKhann says.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
It is always a good thing to test myths. So now we know, at least from this one study, that we see similar cognitive decline in people with coronary artery disease, both in those who had surgery (bypass grafts) and in those who did not. So, the questions then become: If "the disease itself is the basis for cognitive decline," are the medications at fault? There is much antidotal evidence that statin drugs for example cause cognitive problems and they are often prescribed to those with "high cholesterol" who are said to be at risk for heart disease. What are the side effects of the drugs given for diabetes and high blood pressure? Is memory loss just a normal part of aging? The study does not appear to address any sort of nutritional or lifestyle alternation, which could have a significant effect on the outcome, even after heart disease has become manifest. The most effective treatment of any chronic illness is modification of nutrition and lifestyle. The Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine offers FirstLine Therapy to help you make the nutritional and lifestyle changes, and we can treat the brain function itself with our BrainAdvantage™ program.

Sunshine–vitamin D–is the new wonder drug

June 2008

According to a study published in the June 9 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine, men with low levels of vitamin D have more than twice the risk of heart attack. In this study, 18,000 men were studied for 10 years. Those classified as deficient in vitamin D were about 2.5 times more likely to have a heart attack than those with higher levels of the vitamin.

Just last week, another study found that low levels of vitamin D increased the risk of diabetes. And a study released last month linked deficiencies to an increased risk of dying from breast cancer.

Until recently, vitamin D was viewed primarily as a protective agent against bone disease. Researchers are suggesting that the new studies should prompt the government to reconsider the RDA levels for vitamin D.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Despite the amount of sun that we see in Arizona, about 98% of my patients have vitamin D levels which are far below the levels recommended by the Vitamin D council. About 5% have levels below the reference range in lab tests – which are the levels required to prevent rickets. About 20 minutes of exposure to the sun each day, in a skimpy bathing suit, without sunscreen, will help the body manufacture close to 20,000 IU of Vitamin D. Or you can take a pill… or a drop. Does too much sunshine cause skin cancer? Read up on it in our library article, "Skin Cancer, Sunshine, and Vitamin D." As more information like this breaks into the mainstream media, the day will come when we retire the mantra "stay out of the sun – it will give you cancer" just as we tossed out the advice from "experts" a decade ago that a high carbohydrate diet was the way to go. Vitamin D is good for us; we need more of it.

Prescribing antidepressants for stroke

May 2008

Doctors may want to give stroke victims antidepressants right away instead of waiting until they develop depression, a common complication, new research suggests.

The researchers gave low doses of the antidepressant Lexapro to stroke patients. The patients on the drug were 4.5 times less likely to develop depression than patients taking a dummy pill.

The study, appearing in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association, was based on an analysis of 176 stroke patients, ranging in age from 50 to 90.

Someday high-risk people like stroke patients might take the drugs before suffering depression — just as people now take cholesterol drugs to prevent heart attacks, the lead author said.

More than 700,000 Americans suffer strokes each year and more than one-third will develop depression in the next two years. Stroke patients with depression recover more slowly and are more likely to die, according to previous research.

"We showed you could in fact prevent the development of depression after stroke,'' said Dr. Robert Robinson of the University of Iowa who led the study." I hope I don't have a stroke, but if I do, I would certainly want to be placed on an antidepressant.''

But with prevention, some patients take pills who never would have needed them, putting them at risk for unnecessary side effects. Seven stroke patients would have to be treated with antidepressants to prevent one depression, the researchers found.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Even if Lexapro is given to make what serotonin the brain can still produce hang around longer, this does nothing to help the brain recover from its stroke. Whenever there is a stroke, there are always brain cells in the surrounding area which are partially damaged but not yet dead – the area is called the "penumbra" or "shadow zone". These cells still have a chance to recover, if they can be given sufficient energy. However, because of the stroke, their blood supply has been cut off or diminished to the point where they have used up all their stores of readily available energy (ATP) and have used up all the precursors. So they are left with no gas in the tank. Giving ribose helps to put at least a precursor of gas in the tank, so that the cells have a better chance at surviving.

GMO sugar is here and everywhere

May 2008

American Crystal, a large Wyoming-based sugar company, and several other leading U.S. sugar providers have begun sourcing their sugar from genetically engineered (GE) sugar beets.

Like GE corn and GE soy, products containing GE sugar will not be labeled as such. These sugars, like GE corn and soy, are found in many conventional food products, so consumers will be exposed to genetically engineered ingredients in just about every non-organic multiple-ingredient product they purchase.

The GE sugar beet is designed to withstand strong doses of Monsanto's controversial broad spectrum Roundup herbicide. Farmers planting GE sugar beets are told they may be able to apply the herbicide up to five times per year. Weed control is the number one production problem facing sugarbeet growers in the USA; some industry experts say weeds can sap as much as 30 percent of a crop's yield.

"It's a pretty major step," Crystal President David Berg said. "Here at American Crystal, we believe biotechnology is the current wave that will help feed the world."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Since half of the granulated sugar in the U.S. comes from sugar beets, a move towards biotech beets marks a dramatic alteration of the U.S. food supply. Sugar beets have been modified to insert a gene that makes the plant resistant to glyphosate, a toxic herbicide, sold under the trade name Roundup. At the request of Roundup's manufacturer, Monsanto, the EPA increased the allowable amount of glyphosate residues on sugar beet roots by 5,000 percent. The inevitable result is more pesticide in our sugar, and a GM element "hiding" in many items we might by at the grocery store.

According to a recent CBS News/New York Times poll, 53 percent of Americans say they won't buy food that has been genetically modified. But much of it is not labeled. One way to avoid GM is to buy organic.

Check out www.DontPlantGMOBeets.org. The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, a coalition of nearly 300 faith-based institutional investors, launched this Web-based campaign in March, 2008, "because of weak governmental review and oversight, and the lack of long-term, independent and peer-reviewed safety studies."

Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, and Bob Gregory launched the "GM Free Churches" campaign in Virginia to educate churches about the health and spiritual dangers of GMO-ed foods.

More than half of us are on drugs

May 2008

For the first time, it appears that more than half of all insured Americans are taking prescription medicines regularly for chronic health problems, according to data compiled last year by Medco Health Solutions. Medco examined prescription records from 2001 to 2007 of a representative sample of 2.5 million customers, from newborns to the elderly. The analysis revealed "that last year, 51 percent of American children and adults were taking one or more prescription drugs for a chronic condition, up from 50 percent the previous four years, and 47 percent in 2001."

The most widely used drugs are those to lower high blood pressure and cholesterol -- problems often linked to heart disease, obesity and diabetes.

Experts say the data reflect not just worsening public health but better medicines for chronic conditions and more aggressive treatment by doctors. Additionally, there is the pharmaceutical industry's relentless advertising.

Americans buy much more medicine per person than any other country. But it was unclear how their prescriptions compare to those of insured people elsewhere. Comparable data were not available for Europe, for instance.

Dr. Robert Epstein, chief medical officer at Franklin Lakes, N.J.-based Medco, said, "Honestly, a lot of it is related to obesity," he said. "We've become a couch potato culture (and) it's a lot easier to pop a pill" than to exercise regularly or diet. Epstein noted the biggest jump in use of chronic medications was in the 20- to 44-year-old age group - adults in the prime of life - where it rose 20 percent over the six years. That was mainly due to more use of drugs for depression, diabetes, asthma, attention-deficit disorder and seizures.

Dr. Sidney Wolfe of Public Citizen's Health Research Group blames doctors for not spending the time to help patients lose weight and make other healthy changes before writing a prescription.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This one should trigger all kinds of alarm bells. We eat food "products" with chemicals that are bad for us, then start taking drugs to counteract the effect of a non-nutritious diet. How backwards is that? Many of our patients find that even if they start a healthy detoxification and nutritional program like FirstLine Therapy late, they can come off their drugs because they no longer need them. This is the perfect example of "less is more." And the choice is ours – modify our lifestyle and eating habits, or take drugs to counteract the effects. The drugs come with side effects and do not resolve problems at their core. It seems like a pretty obvious decision to me…

New asthma inhalers cause problems and cost more

May 2008

Millions of people with asthma and other lung diseases will have to switch inhalers by the end of the year. And for many, the transition will not be smooth.

The new inhalers have a less forceful spray, and less appealing taste, and differ in how they are primed and cleaned. And they cost perhaps three times as much.

inhalersThe change is mandated by the federal government in response to a ban of most uses of chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, which are blamed for eating away the earth's ozone layer. CFCs are used as propellants in many inhalers. The new "CFC-free" inhalers use propellants called HFAs, for hydrofluoroalkanes.

Three of the four new HFA-propelled inahlers still use the drug albuterol.

"What the government failed to do is to mandate anyone to tell patients and physicians this transition was happening," said Nancy Sander, president of the Allergy and Asthma Network Mothers of Asthmatics. "There is no education, no monitoring of patients, no financial assistance to patients who have to pay higher prices for the new drugs."

The cost difference has meant huge gains for drug companies. As people switched to HFA inhalers in 2006 and 2007, sales of all albuterol inhalers jumped from about $500 million to $1.1 billion, according to I.M.S. Health, a health care information company.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
So, we have done something good for the planet by reducing CFCs, but we didn't do something good for the human body. The new inhalers still make use of fluorine, so you get some every time you puff. Fluorine displaces iodine, causes the thyroid to function poorly, and is toxic to the lungs.

Politics control EPA analyses of chemical risks

May 2008

Democratic senators accused the Bush administration of injecting politics into the Environmental Protection Agency's assessment of health risks from toxic chemicals, citing a congressional investigation that concluded assessments are being undermined by secrecy and White House involvement.

A Government Accountability Office report said White House demand for broad interagency involvement in EPA's toxic chemical risk assessments is undermining the agency's ability to make timely, science-based conclusions on the cancer risks and other health impacts of many chemicals. John Stephenson, GAO's director of natural resource programs, told the Senate Environment Committee that the White House Office of Management and Budget not only is closely involved in the chemical assessments but "actually dictating which assessments that the EPA can undertake."

"By placing politics before science, the Bush administration is putting the public in harm's way," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., at a hearing into EPA's toxic chemical programs.

Dr. Grout's Comment:

At issue is the EPA's screening of chemicals used in everything from household products to rocket fuel to determine whether they pose serious risk of cancer or other illnesses. Headlines like this are why Diane Rehm of National Public Radio says the public has little faith anymore in the EPA's ability to protect public health.

Do the White House politicians have such in-depth knowledge of chemistry and medicine that they should feel themselves competent to judge which chemicals should be tested and which are sufficiently safe that they do not need to be tested at all??

Yuma girl's autism case spearheads court fight

April 2008

CNN reports that 13-year old Michelle Cedillo of Yuma, Arizona, is at the center of a court case pitting thousands of families of children with autism against the medical establishment.

Theresa and her husband, Mike, say their only child was a happy, engaged toddler who responded to her name, said "mommy" and "daddy" and was otherwise normal until she received a measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine at 15 months.

They believe the MMR vaccine, combined with a mercury-containing preservative found in that and other vaccines at the time, drastically altered the course of their daughter's development. Within days of receiving the injection as part of the normal course of vaccinations, Michelle suffered from a high fever, persistent vomiting and problems with her digestion. Worse still, her parents say, Michelle stopped speaking and no longer responded to her name.

Dr. Paul Offit, chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, says the connection between vaccines and autism is nothing more than a sad coincidence.

"About 20 percent of children with autism will regress between their first and second birthday," says Offit. "So statistically, it will have to happen where some children will get a vaccine. They will have been fine. They will get the vaccine, and they will not be fine anymore. And I think parents can reasonably ask the question, 'Is it the vaccine that did this?'"

The answer is no, according to the CDC, the World Health Organization, and the Institute of Medicine.

Michelle Cedillo's parents disagree. They've sued the government through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established in 1988 to pay damages to those who have suffered as a result of vaccines. Funded by a 75-cent tax added to the cost of each vaccine dose, the program's trust fund balance is more than $2.7 billion.

Michelle's autism claim is one of 4,900 in a single case before a special federal court, dubbed the "vaccine court," part of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The court picked Michelle's claim as the first of a total of nine test cases from the 4,900.

At Michelle Cedillo's hearing last year, Dr. Marcel Kinsbourne, a pediatric neurologist who is a professor at The New School in New York, testified that he thought the measles vaccine was a "substantial factor" in causing the girl's autism. Traces of the measles virus were found in Michelle's gut, leading the Oxford University-trained doctor to conclude the girl's immune system had not rejected the virus. Kinsbourne told the court the measles virus invaded cells in Michelle's brain, resulting in her autism.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
What the CNN story did not reveal was Dr. Paul Offit's conflicts of interest. He is one of the patent holders of the rotavirus vaccine, the recipient of a $350,000 grant from Merck for its development, a consultant to Merck Pharmaceuticals, and a vocal spokesman for the pro-vaccine forces.

Dr Paul OffitAlthough mercury has been removed from most vaccines, vaccines can still contain traces of mercury, at a level so low the actual amount doesn't have to be stated. In other words, they are called "mercury-free." Also, there has been no attempt to remove the other ingredients in vaccines that can cause neurological damage such as aluminum, formaldehyde, phenol, and MSG (used as a stabilizer).

Alzheimer's Risk Test – identify the gene

April 2008

A Pennsylvania company is about to go to market with a genetic test that will tell healthy people whether they are at increased risk for developing Alzheimer's disease. But the test is getting a mixed response from researchers.

The test will be offered by Smart Genetics. For $399, healthy people will give a saliva sample and learn whether they have a risk of Alzheimer's that's 3 to 15 times higher than normal. The analysis is based on variations in the APOE gene, which is widely agreed to play a role in Alzheimer's risk and heart disease.

Researchers express reservations about making the gene test widely available. They worry about the mental health consequences of telling people they may get a disease that's neither preventable nor treatable and is invariably fatal. "I think the benefits [of knowing your genotype] are trivial" and don't justify the emotional risks, says law professor Henry Greely of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, who in 1997 co-chaired a working group on Alzheimer's genetic testing. The group concluded that genetic testing for Alzheimer's "is not appropriate for most people."

Greely thinks knowing the results might help the roughly 2% of the population with the worst APOE combination: two copies of the deleterious E4 allele, which together confer a roughly 15 times increased risk of the disease. For them, Greely says, the risk is so great that the information may be useful in planning health care needs or retirement.

But a much larger portion of the population, about 25%, carries one copy of APOE4; their risk of Alzheimer's is roughly three times higher than normal. Greely doesn't think these people need to know their APOE status, and Allen Roses of Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who found the APOE-Alzheimer's link, agrees: "It isn't helpful if there's nothing you can do about it" medically.

But Richard Watson, chief technical officer of Smart Genetics, argues that knowing one is at higher risk can trigger practical responses. Watson says these might include regular memory screenings or making certain financial decisions such as buying long-term care insurance.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
What disappoints me about this news article is its fatalistic overtones. Have we somehow missed hearing about the positive roles of Vitamin B12 and B3, and somehow ignored the negative effects of gluten, artificial sweeteners and colorings, chemicals and the like? I must have missed something in the last 15 years when all these things were being discussed and debated in more advanced medical circles. This article merely speaks to predicting and managing a disease.

Chinese patientsThe Chinese use chess to help stimulate the brain. Chess, of all the possible games, utilizes strategy and planning – both activities which originate in the frontal lobes of the brain. There is treatment for memory loss. Stay tuned, on this website, for news of a simple way to stimulate the frontal lobes of the brain to improve memory and concentration – no drugs, no bad side effects, just increased mental clarity and memory. This therapy will be available at The Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine starting in July of 2008 – the only place in the country for this particular kind of therapy in a medical setting.

Study suggests life expectancy declining

April 2008

Until recently, life expectancy had declined in only two instances in the last century: In sub Saharan Africa because of HIV-AIDS, and in the former Soviet Union, when the healthcare system there collapsed.

But now, it's happening here in the United States, according to a study published in the Apr. 22 issue of PLoS Medicine.

Nearly one-fifth of women in this country had their life expectancy fall, or stay the same between 1961 and 1999, compared with just four percent of males.

Scientists at the Harvard School of Public Health and the University of Washington found the majority of the counties that had the worst downward swings in life expectancy were in the Deep South, along the Mississippi River, and in Appalachia, extending into the southern portion of the Midwest and into Texas.

Researchers examined data from more than 2,000 county 'units' between 1959 and 2001. The found that in about "1,000 of those counties -- mainly poor, rural areas -- life expectancy for women dropped starting in the 1980s, 'primarily because of chronic diseases related to smoking, overweight and obesity, and high blood pressure."

The study also showed "increased death rates among women from lung cancer and emphysema, which probably reflects the fact that American women did not take up smoking in large numbers until tobacco companies started marketing cigarette brands for them in the 1970s."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Could it be that our toxic world - our growing body burden of environmental exposures - is coming back to bite us?

Children taking AD/HD drugs should be screened

April 2008

Children should be screened for heart problems with an electrocardiogram before getting drugs like Ritalin to treat hyperactivity and attention-deficit disorder, according to a new American Heart Association recommendation published online in the journal Circulation.

Stimulant drugs can increase blood pressure and heart rate. For children with heart conditions, the drugs could make them more vulnerable to sudden cardiac arrest — an erratic heartbeat that causes the heart to stop pumping blood through the body — and other heart problems.

Data indicate that more than two dozen children taking stimulant drugs died suddenly between 1992 and 2005, prompting U.S. regulators to ask for warnings on all the drugs.

About 2.5 million American children and 1.5 million adults take medication for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, or AD/HD, according to government estimates. Stimulant drugs, like Ritalin, Adderall and Concerta, are given to help children with AD/HD stay focused and control their behavior.

But Dr. Steven Pliszka, a child psychiatrist at the University of Texas in San Antonio, said he was baffled by the EKG recommendation. He said there's no evidence that sudden death is a bigger problem for children taking stimulants than for children who aren't taking the drugs.

He noted that the heart association doesn't recommended EKG screening for young athletes to prevent sudden death. The group has said it wasn't feasible or cost-effective to screen all student athletes.

Representatives for Shire PLC, which makes Adderall and two other AD/HD treatments, and Norvartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., which makes Ritalin, said the labeling already suggests patients be evaluated for heart problems and an EKG done if needed.

"There's no new information here. And frankly, we're a little perplexed as to the purpose of the American Heart Assocation coming out with this statement at this time," said Shire spokesman Matt Cabrey.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
And we are STILL recommending drugs as first-line therapy for AD/HD? What is wrong with this picture? Diet and lifestyle and brain training are more effective, less dangerous, and much healthier.

BOTOX may get to the brain after all

April 2008

Newsweek's Sharon Begley reports that researchers have discovered, after millions of people have used BOTOX, that the botulinum toxin can travel along neurons from the injection site into the brain, at least in lab animals.

Researchers at Italy's Institute of Neuroscience injected rats and mice with botulinum neurotoxin A in doses comparable to those used in people. They report this month in The Journal of Neuroscience that within three days, the toxin had migrated from the whisker muscles to the brainstem, where it disrupted neuronal activity. "The discovery was quite serendipitous ... and surprising," Matteo Caleo, who led the study, told the journal Science. "A significant portion of the toxin is active where it's not intended to be."

That stands in contrast to the findings of earlier studies, which suggested the neurotoxin is completely broken down at the injection site into innocuous compounds and does not migrate beyond it—or if it does, only into the bloodstream or lymph system.

Botox's manufacturer, Allergan, said the older studies are more credible.

Begley wrote: "Something else that can be seen in a different light is the hospitalizations and deaths that have been reported following Botox injections. In 2005 scientists at the FDA analyzed 1,437 such "adverse events" between 1989, when Botox was approved for eye spasms, and 2003. Most came from people who got Botox to erase their wrinkles, but the 28 deaths occurred in people who had received it for medical purposes. The FDA didn't do much in response, but since then it has been getting new reports of serious adverse reactions in people receiving Botox, and launched a safety review."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
So… one more reason to be wary of trying to appear to be something other than what we actually are. Health and beauty come through good nutrition for body, brain and mind. If we are content with the current state of our lives, there is no reason for frown lines, and they do not have to be flattened by artificial means. Botox is a drug – in fact it is a deadly toxic byproduct of the botulinus bacterium which used to be found in inadequately sterilized canned goods. Why would we want to inject deadly toxins deliberately into our bodies?

Plastic's bisphenol A is a gender-bender

Nalgene bottleApril 2008

A new government report's findings on rat studies suggest a chemical used to make plastic baby bottles and shatterproof containers is linked to a range of hormonal and cancerous problems.

The federal National Toxicology Program said Tuesday that experiments on rats found precancerous tumors, urinary tract problems and early puberty when the animals were fed or injected with low doses of the plastics chemical bisphenol A.

More than 90 percent of Americans are exposed to trace amounts of bisphenol, according to the CDC. The chemical leaches out of water bottles, the lining of cans and other items made with it.

While animal studies only provide "limited evidence" of bisphenol's developmental risks, the draft report stresses the possible effects on humans "cannot be dismissed." The group is made up of scientists from the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration and the Institutes of Health.

However, the American Chemistry Council, which represents manufacturers, said the report "affirms that there are no serious or high level concerns for adverse effects of bisphenol on human reproduction and development." Among the manufacturers of bisphenol are Dow Chemical Co. and BASF Group.

The FDA in November said there is "no reason at this time to ban or otherwise restrict its use." The agency on Tuesday did not immediately have any comment about the new report.

Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., called on FDA Tuesday to reconsider the safety of bisphenol, saying the toxicology report's findings "fly in the face of the FDA's determination."

Earlier this month state lawmakers in New Jersey passed a bill that would ban the sale of all products containing bisphenol.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Canada has now banned the sale of products containing bisphenol A. WalMart Canada pulled off the shelves baby bottles containing this toxic chemical. Interestingly, this did not happen in the United States. WalMart declared its intention to remove those products by early 2009. In the meantime, the products are still on the shelf. This reminds me of the thimerosal story in 1999 – thimerosal was banned from vaccines as a preservative, but it was still permitted to sell the vaccines left over from the old manufacturing ways – and so thimerosal did not actually come out of the supply chain until about 2002, when the old stores were finally used up. It is possible that there is a conflict of interest between our physical health and the financial health of big industry?

Earlier studies showed low amounts of bisphenol A have the ability to mimic human estrogen, but now we see a U.S. government study addressing the problem.

The draft report said, in pretty plain language, that "bisphenol A can migrate into food from food and beverage containers with internal epoxy resin coatings and from consumer products made of polycarbonate plastic such as baby bottles, tableware, food containers, and water bottles. … Bisphenol A can also be found in breast milk. Biomonitoring studies show that human exposure to bisphenol A is widespread."

The report said that "laboratory rodents show that exposure to high dose levels of bisphenol A during pregnancy and/or lactation can reduce survival, birth weight, and growth of offspring early in life, and delay the onset of puberty in males and females. A variety of effects related to neural and behavior alterations, precancerous lesions in the prostate and mammary glands, altered prostate gland and urinary tract development, and early onset of puberty in females have been reported in laboratory rodents exposed during development to much lower doses of bisphenol A that are more similar to human exposures."

Do you carry a polycarbonate water bottle your car in the Arizona summer heat? If so, then you'll find this part of the report interesting: "The degree to which bisphenol A migrates from polycarbonate containers into liquid appears to depend more on the temperature of the liquid than the age of the container, i.e., more migration with higher temperatures."

Environmental Working Group found that bisphenol A leaches from the metal lining of cans and has been found at alarmingly high rates in one-third of the cans of baby formula tested. Bisphenol A is also found in soda cans, in refrigerator shelving, microwave ovenware, water pipes, electrical appliances, flooring, and part of the plastic used in covering children cavities.

You can join the growing ranks of consumers who are demanding glass – a good idea for health and for the environment because glass can be recycled. Plastic will be around for tens of thousands of years.

Bats are dying – like bees, it's a mystery

April 2008

Something is killing the bats. And as was the case with the bees a couple years ago, no one knows for sure what.

The epicenter of the annihilation so far is New York. Hikers noticed dead and dying bats littered outside the caves where they hibernate. Bats normally hybernate during the winter and do not fly during the daytime. The bats are also noted to be hibernating close the caves' entrances, in contrast with their usual inclination to go deeper inside.

The loss of bats cascaded this winter to the point researchers fear extinction is underway.

The cause is unknown, though there is a name for the phenomenon, White Nose Syndrome. It's a fungus that's particularly obvious on the nose and face, though it's found dotted all over the bats' bodies. It is believed to be just a symptom of an underlying problem, as yet unknown.

A primary suspicion is the use of pesticides. The fact that there has been wide spread spraying of pesticides for West Nile Virus is a possibility.

The president of Bat Conservation International, Merlin Tuttle, stated, "So far as we can tell at this point, this may be the most serious threat to North American bats we've experienced in recorded history."

A wildlife biologist with Vermont's Fish and Wildlife Department, Scott Darling says, "Logic dictates when you are potentially losing as many as a half a million bats in this region, there are going to be ramifications for insect abundance in the coming summer." Translation: massive mosquito outbreaks.

Crops also may be affected. Bats are significant controllers of many crop-destructive insects.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
The loss of bats may be an even worse concern than the loss of bees. Bats are the world's greatest insect eaters. A small brown bat can eat as many as 600 mosquitoes in an hour. The implications for agriculture are enormous. The spread of severe communicable diseases could be devastating. Diseases borne by mosquitoes include Eastern Equine Encephalitis, Malaria, Dengue Fever, and West Nile Virus.

Health Insurance Mafia – by Jonathan Kellerman

April 2008

Writing in the Wall Street Journal 4-14-08, author Jonathan Kellerman points out that most discussions about the rising cost of health care emphasize the need to get more people insured. Excerpt:

"But perhaps the solution to much of what currently plagues us in health care rests on a radically different approach: fewer people insured.

"Any middleman interposed between seller and buyer raises the price of a given service or product.

"Insurance is all about betting against negative consequences and the insurance business model is unique in that profits depend upon goods and services not being provided. Using actuarial tables, insurers place their bets.

"Health insurers suck the lifeblood out of the supply chain with obstructive strategies. For that reason, there will be progressively draconian rationing using denial of authorization and steadily rising co-payments on the patient end; massive paperwork and other bureaucratic hurdles, and steadily diminishing fee-recovery on the doctor end.

"Some of us are old enough to remember visiting the doctor and paying him/her directly by check or cash. The same went for hospitals: no $20 aspirins due to insurance-company delay tactics and other shenanigans.

"A hefty proportion of health-care services – office visits, minor surgeries – would be affordable to most Americans if the slice of the health-care dollar that currently ends up in the coffers of insurance companies was eliminated. It is a fantasy that 'insurance is paying.' It isn't. There is no free lunch and no free physical exam.

"If substantial numbers of health-care providers shook off the insurance monkey on their back, en masse, and the supply of providers was substantially increased by opening more medical schools, the result would be a more honest, cost-effective system benefiting everyone. Except the insurance companies.

Dr. Kellerman, clinical professor of pediatrics and psychology at USC's Keck School of Medicine, is the author of numerous crime novels and three books on psychology. His latest novel is "Compulsion" (Ballantine, 2008).

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Right on, Dr. Kellerman! I could not have said it better myself. The assumption seems to be that insurance – rather than the service delivered by doctor to patient – is the more important element in the equation.

Low birth weight, excessive adolescent weight – is it low-grade inflammation?

April 2008

According to a study published in the European Heart Journal, "small size at birth, and excessive weight gain during adolescence and young adulthood, may lead to low-grade inflammation."

Paul Elliott, Ph.D., of Imperial College London, and colleagues, analyzed data on 5,840 people who were followed from birth to the age of 31. Researchers looked at the participants' levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in their blood. Elevated levels of CRP can indicate a chronic, low-grade inflammation. The authors "found that those who were amongst the smallest at birth, but who then put on the most weight by age 31, had the highest average CRP levels."

The rapidity of growth in adolescence appeared to be more important for inflammation than weight or BMI [body mass index] alone. The researchers wrote, "The finding that weight gain from adolescence to young adulthood appears to play a greater role in low-grade inflammation than weight in adolescence per se, could have important implications for the primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
All the more reason to start our children out with very healthy anti-inflammatory foods – meats, fruits and vegetables – without additives or colorings or extra sugars. We could almost certainly prevent most of the healthcare spending in later life if we gave our children a good start in life, with food messages to their genes which promote health.

Normal body weight may have high body fat - increased disease risks

April 2008

More than half of U.S. adults of normal body weight may have high body fat, and may be at risk for disease, according to findings presented at the American College of Cardiology meeting in Chicago.

The study specifically links so-called normal-weight obesity with risk factors like high blood cholesterol and metabolic syndrome. Moreover, those who fell "within a healthy weight range for their height – a body mass index range of 18.5 to 24.9," were also "more likely to have risk factors for heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes."

Researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., collected data on 2,127 people who participated in the U.S. government's Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and found that "61 percent of the participants had levels of body fat that indicated 'normal weight obesity." In addition, the team noted "changes in blood chemistry that can affect heart and metabolic health, including high cholesterol" and "high levels of leptin, a hormone found in fat and other tissues that's involved in appetite regulation."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This is called "sarcopenic obesity" – meaning relative lack of muscle compared with total body weight. This is where measurement of the bio-impedance analysis (BIA) of the body is helpful, to gauge amount of body fat, muscle, intracellular water, and other parameters which help us to gauge how healthy or toxic a person may be. At the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine we do this measurement on all our new patients, and then repeat the measurement periodically as they go through our nutritional program which is geared at restoring the body to health and eliminating the risk factors of hypertension, hyperglycemia, high cholesterol and metabolic syndrome.

Mercury fillings banned - Norway and Sweden are first

April 2008

According to the Journal of the American Dental Association, effective April 1st, 2008, Sweden banned mercury fillings. Norway banned them effective January 1, 2008. Other countries are contemplating similar moves.

The American Dental Association is not on board. "Banning 'dental amalgam' is a political issue that will not only have no impact on total worldwide mercury pollution, but also removes a viable treatment option for dentists and their patients," argues Derek Jones in an editorial published in the Journal of Dental Research.

"These bans clearly indicate that amalgam is no longer needed. There are viable non-mercury filling substitutes that are used everyday in the U.S.," said Michael Bender of the U.S. Mercury Policy Project. "By eliminating amalgam use, which is 50% mercury, we can reduce mercury pollution much more efficiently than end-of-the-pipeline solutions."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Dental amalgam, or silver filling material, has been around for some 150 years. Yes, it's the same mercury you saw in thermometers as a kid and were warned never to touch. Mercury is a known toxin. From a dentist's perspective, it is a long-lasting material that is cheap and easy to use. It is estimated that half of all dentists still use mercury-based restorations in their practice.

Consumers for Dental Choice, a non-profit organization, is suing the FDA, asking it to remove mercury fillings from the market. Mercury isn't the only culprit by the way, lots of metals used in amalgam filings that can affect certain individuals with a particular sensitivity. The mouth is part of the overall body and it can infect the rest of the body. If you think you have a problem component in your fillings, we can test you for an allergic or hypersensitivity reaction, just as we can test for any other allergic reaction like pollens or molds.

Measles reported in Pima County – call for vaccinations

April 2008

The Arizona Republic reports that nine cases of measles have been confirmed in Pima County since February.

Four adults and four children have been infected. Officials say it could have spread out of Pima County.

"One case of the measles in a community is an outbreak," Dr. Karen Lewis, a medical director with the Arizona Department of Health Services, said. "You don't know how well people are immunized or not immunized until you have one case."

Most children are now immunized against the measles, and many adults born before 1957 had a case of the "hard measles" when they were young and are now immune, Lewis said.

But health officials are concerned about a trend against vaccinating children, which Lewis said is born out of a belief in vaccines' links to other problems, like autism. She said studies have shown no such link.

The disease is spread in the air, and people can become infected just by being in the same room or in a room with the same ventilation as someone infected. The first few Pima County patients were people exposed in the emergency room of Northwest Medical Center, where a woman from Switzerland was waiting to be seen.

The Tucson outbreak follows one in San Diego last month in which 12 children were infected. That outbreak is believed to have been caused by a child who contracted the disease while visiting Switzerland, which has been experiencing a large measles outbreak.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Let us ask, "What would be the harm in getting the measles?" A vaccine only protects a child for about 8 years; an actual case of measles confers protection for life. Measles in adults is much more serious.

In the factual world of public health risk assessment, 1 in 1000 children who contracts measles dies or gets encephalitis, the other 999 are protected for life. That's 0.1% serious or fatal complications.

We now have an autism epidemic where we are seeing 1 in 150 children affected. That's a big incidence – possibly from complications of vaccination. Lewis may say, "studies show no link" but that is not accurate. In November last year, after years of insisting there is no evidence to link vaccines with the onset of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the US government quietly conceded a vaccine-autism case in the Court of Federal Claims.

In many autistic children the MMR vaccine with live measles virus has produced an ongoing intestinal infection. Live viruses can trigger a strong and long-lasting immunity, but they may cause serious infections and even death in people who are immune-compromised and sometimes may cause serious infections in people who are apparently healthy.

Parents need to weigh the risk.

Cell phones more dangerous than smoking

March 2008

Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.

The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, draws on growing evidence that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.

"It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking," says Professor Khurana. His assessment is partly based on the fact that three billion people now use the phones worldwide, three times as many as smoke. Smoking kills some five million worldwide each year.

Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimize handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.

Professor Khurana – a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers – reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones. He has put the results on a brain surgery website, and a paper based on the research is currently being peer-reviewed for publication in a scientific journal.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
A mobile-phone industry group dismissed Khurana's claims as exaggerated and pointed out that health groups say cell phones are safe. The American Cancer Society also says there is no link. But consider this: It took until the 1960's for people to accept the idea that cigarette smoke was harmful. It was another 20 to 30 years before secondhand smoke was accepted as dangerous and outlawed in the work place. Cigarette proponents for decades offered that health claims were exaggerated, that "It's not for sure," and "It needs more study."

Resveratrol and pancreatic cancer – helpful antioxidant

March 2008

Resveratrol, an antioxidant found in red-purple grape skins and red wine, "destroyed pancreatic cancer cells," according to a study published in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

grapes - source of resveratrolPaul Okunieff, M.D., chief of radiation oncology at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York, and colleagues, examined the effects of a 50 microgram/milliliter dose of resveratrol on pancreatic cancer cells alone, and in combination with radiation treatment. Researchers found that "resveratrol seems to have a therapeutic gain by making tumor cells more sensitive to radiation and making normal tissue less sensitive." Moreover, resveratrol "injured the cancer cell's energy source, and decreased its potential to function." The authors concluded, "While additional studies are needed, this research indicates that resveratrol has a promising future as part of the treatment for cancer."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
It is good to see appearing in mainstream literature what has been common knowledge in functional medicine circles for years. Yes, anti-oxidants are very helpful to treat all forms of oxidative stress, including cancer. Resveratrol is one of the polyphenol antioxidants abundant in grapes, berries, tea, red cabbage, eggplant, beans, whole grains, and cocoa. It is most abundant in blue, red, and purple grapes. Resveratrol is also abundant in a Chinese medicinal root called hu zhang (Polygonum cuspidatum), which is often the source of resveratrol in dietary supplements.

Resveratrol is produced by the grape plant to protect it against environmental stress. How fitting that it will also help to protect us against environmental stress – because what is cancer, if not the ultimate result of environmental stress? And when we eat the grapes, we derive the same benefit as the plant – this is called xenohormesis – messages through our food from other species. How much better to eat these helpful messages, rather than the terrified hormonal messages from the modern meat slaughterhouses.

WalMart goes rBGH free – cleaner milk

March 2008

WalMart announced its store brand of milk, which is labeled "Great Value," will no longer come from cows injected with Monsanto's controversial genetically engineered hormone, rBGH/rBST.

rBGH is banned in Europe, Canada, and most of the industrialized world.

WalMart said its change was prompted by consumer demands. "Many WalMart customers have expressed a desire for milk choices," the company said in a news release.

Organic Consumer Union's Director, Ronnie Cummins, stated in an interview with the Toronto Globe and Mail, Wal-Mart's announcement will likely serve as a tipping point for driving Monsanto's controversial bovine drug off the market. The group has campaigned aggressively against rBGH. According to Cummins, "After 14 years of bullying consumers and buying off FDA and USDA bureaucrats, this is the beginning of the end for this dangerous drug."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
rBGH is sold as Posilac. Monsanto has been forced to admit to about 20 toxic effects, including mastitis, on its Posilac label. Mastitis causes increased amounts of pus in milk. The use of it increases the amount of milk cows give.

According to Dr. Samuel Epstein, rBGH milk is supercharged with high levels of a natural growth factor (IGF-1), which is readily absorbed through the gut. Excess levels of IGF-1 have been incriminated as a cause of breast, colon, and prostate cancers; IGF-1 blocks natural defense mechanisms against early submicroscopic cancers.

WalMart's move sends a powerful signal to food manufacturers about the growing mainstream demand for food that is free of hormones and other man-made contaminants. Educated consumers have the power to move mountains.

Dennis and Kimberly QuaidDennis Quaid's twins drug ordeal – hospital mistakes

March 2008

Actor Dennis Quaid and his wife, Kimberly, were featured on the news program 60 Minutes as they kicked off a new campaign to bring national attention to hospital errors.

When the Quaid's newborn twins showed signs of a having a staph infection last November, they were admitted to Cedars-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles for treatment. A hospital mistake resulted in two massive overdoses of a blood thinner that caused the babies to nearly bleed to death.

The same type of avoidable mistake was made a year earlier in an Indiana hospital. In that case, six infants were given multiple adults doses of heparin instead of the pediatric version. Three of the six infants died.

"The mistakes that occurred to us were not unique," Quaid said. Preventable human medical error is one of the leading causes of death in America. "It's bigger than AIDS. It's bigger than breast cancer. It's bigger than automobile accidents. And, yet, no one seems to be really be aware of the problem," he says.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
In 2000 the Institute of Medicine (medical arm of the National Academy of Science) published the results of a long term study on medical errors titled "To Err is Human".

Among its findings-
Every single year in the US direct medical errors result in:
  • at least 100,000 deaths (half medication error, half surgical error)
  • 116 million extra doctors visits
  • 77 million extra prescriptions
  • 17 million extra emergency room visits
  • 8 million extra hospitalizations
Another 225,000 deaths occur from preventable adverse events such as hospital borne infections.

It is estimated that only 5 to 20 percent of adverse reactions and medical mistakes are ever reported.

The "To Err is Human" report concluded that if put in their own category, medical errors would be the 5th leading cause of death in the US killing more people than stroke, Alzheimer's, most forms of cancer, and car accidents.

According to Dr. Carolyn Dean, author of Death by Modern Medicine in 2005, the mainstream medical industry kills 784,000 people each year in America; "Saddam Hussein did not kill that many people each year," she wrote.

Genes factor into post-traumatic stress disorder – child abuse key

March 2008

According to a study published in the March 19th issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, "people abused as children, who have variations of a gene related to stress, may be at higher risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) later."

Elizabeth B. Binder, M.D., Ph.D., of Emory University in Atlanta, Ga., and colleagues, recruited 900 participants from the general medical and obstetrics/gynecology clinics of a public hospital. The patients "reported a history of child-abuse trauma or trauma from other causes on a survey," and they all "had single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping."

The researchers analyzed eight FKBP5 polymorphisms, and found no significant effect on the total PSS [PTSD Symptom Scale] score, and no significant interaction with exposure to non–child abuse trauma. But, analysis identified four SNPs [single nucleotide polymorphisms] that showed significant interactions with childhood abuse. Moreover, "SNPs associated with the highest induction of FKBP5 expression were associated with increased risk of adult PTSD symptoms, and greater GR [glucocorticoid receptor] sensitivity."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Lots of genetic variants can certainly explain in part why some people get a disease and others don't, with exactly the same predisposing factors. However, it is important to realize that there still has to be a "provoking incident" in order for the genetic variant to result in an actual expression of disease. This is called an "epigenetic" factor, something which happens to the person with the genetic variant. So… genetic variants exist. They do not result in disease unless the epigenetic factors are sufficient to overwhelm the system. Thus, post traumatic stress disorder does not occur in the absence of a significant traumatic stress. Heart disease and osteoporosis do not occur in the absence of a diet and lifestyle predisposing to inflammation. We can't change our genetic variants, but we certainly have a great deal of influence over their expression.

Not all diabetes is the same – there are genetic subtypes

March 2008

The Associated Press reports, "Diabetes is undergoing a genetics revolution that suggests there actually are many subtypes of the disease." A set of subtypes is called MODY, which is "shorthand for six different subtypes thought to account for two percent of all diabetes." In addition, each is caused by a single, different gene. Diabetes specialists typically suspect MODY "when patients are extra hard to treat, especially skinny people diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, or young adults with diabetic relatives who abruptly seem to develop Type 1."

Andrew Hattersley, M.D., a British physician-scientist, has pioneered how to treat single-gene subtypes. For instance, Dr. Hattersley has found that old diabetes drugs called sulfonylureas neutralize a gene called HNF1-alpha so insulim production resumes. To date, researchers have discovered 16 genes that "play a role in Type 2 diabetes, and at least 14 in Type 1." MODY may explain at least partially why diabetes strikes one person who's overweight, but not another who's equally heavy, or why one diabetic needs dialysis, while another has healthy kidneys despite decades of bad blood sugar.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
So maybe those people who respond poorly to a low glycemic diet would respond better if they were simultaneously taking something to increase their insulin sensitivity – like the hops rho alpha iso acids pioneered by the Metagenics company, or even like metformin, pioneered by the pharmaceutical industry. It is helpful to know the genotype, in order to be able to treat the individual in the most appropriate and economic way.

'Natural' personal care products contain carcinogens – misleading

March 2008

The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) reports a toxic chemical linked to cancer is found in more than 40 percent products that call themselves "natural".

OCA analyzed leading "natural" and "organic" brand shampoos, body washes, lotions and other personal care products for the presence of the undisclosed carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-Dioxane, a petroleum compound.

OCA reports, "Ethoxylation, a cheap short-cut companies use to provide mildness to harsh ingredients, requires the use of the cancer-causing petrochemical Ethylene Oxide, which generates 1,4-Dioxane as a by-product. 1,4-Dioxane is considered a chemical 'known to the State of California to cause cancer' under proposition 65, and has no place in 'natural' or 'organic' branded personal care products. 1,4-dioxane is also suspected as a kidney toxicant, neurotoxicant and respiratory toxicant, and is a leading groundwater contaminant."

Some of the leading brands which were found to contain 1,4-dioxane included Jason Pure and Natural Organic, Giovanni Organic Cosmetics, Kiss My Face, and Nature's Gate Organics.

Dr. Grout's Comments:
When reading labels on personal products and makeup, you can avoid ingredients with "myreth," "oleth," "laureth," "ceteareth," any other "eth," "PEG," "polyethylene," "polyethylene glycol," "polyoxyethylene," or "oxynol," in the names.

Consumer beware. Your best bet is to purchase products whose ingredients you can pronounce or are certified under the USDA National Organic Program.

Brazilian protesters destroy GM crops – sending a message

March 2008

Approximately 300 women in Brazil burst into a property owned by the US company Monsanto and destroyed a plant nursery and crops containing genetically modified corn.The women were protesting what they saw as environmental damage by the crops.

The Brazilian government had "caved in to pressure from agrobusinesses" by recently allowing tinkered crops to be grown in the country, said Igor Foride, a member of the Landless Workers' Movement.

In Brasilia, a protest by another 400 women from an umbrella group, Via Campesina (the Rural Way), was held in front of the Swiss embassy against Syngenta, a Swiss company that is selling genetically modified seeds in Brazil.

Via Campesina said in a statement that "no scientific studies exist that guarantee that genetically modified crops won't have negative effects on human health and on nature."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Violence is a tough way to make a point, but their point is valid. There are no studies that show GM foods are safe, but there are studies that raise serious doubts.

Exposure to diacetyl fumes may cause lung damage - "popcorn lung"

March 2008

According to a study published online in Toxicology Sciences, a "chemical used to give butter flavor to popcorn can damage the lungs and airways of mice." Scientists at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences studied the effects of diacetyl, a component of artificial butter flavoring on mice.

Daniel Morgan, Ph.D., and colleagues, found that the mice developed lung damage when exposed to levels of diacetyl fumes found in flavoring factories. Other studies have linked diacetyl fumes to a rare, life-threatening lung disease called bronchiolitis obliterans [or popcorn lung] in workers in the flavor industry. The disease makes it difficult for air to flow out of the lungs.

Currently, the FDA classifies diacetyl as being 'generally recognized as safe,' but consumer advocates have petitioned the agency to reconsider "diacetyl's safety status.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
This study speaks for itself. We keep coming back to the same old statement, if we can't pronounce it, and it has to be made in a laboratory, we probably should not eat it (or breathe it).

CDC withdraws preference for combination MMRV – increased seizures

March 2008

vaccinationsU.S. health officials are no longer recommending the combination MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella) vaccine over the MMR vaccine in combination with a separate varicella vaccine. According to a report published in the Mar. 14 issue of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the move comes after new data showed that the MMRV shot increased the risk for febrile seizures - convulsions brought on by fever - in children aged 12 to 23 months. Another reason for the change is the fact that due to "manufacturing difficulties, the MMRV shot, made by Merck, won't really be available until about this time next year."

The changes have nothing to do with a possible vaccination link to autism," said Dr. Robert Frenck, a professor of pediatrics at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
At least this delay gives us time to inform our parents that the vaccination schedule, as it is currently established, is unsafe and needs to be significantly modified in order to be safe for those of our children who have difficulty with detoxification. And is it possible that the recorded drop in IQ scores over the past 10 years may reflect the difficulty of ALL our children with these injections of toxic and infectious compounds? We have an entire lost generation, those children who received vaccinations between 1990 and 2002, who are at risk for developmental and immune system dysfunction for the rest of their lives. If we learn from the events, then we can do something to help future generations of children. It is up to us, one child at a time.

Pharmaceuticals found in drinking water – what affect on humans?

March 2007

An Associated Press investigation found that a vast array of pharmaceuticals - including antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones - have been found in the drinking water supplies of 24 major metropolitan areas, from Southern California to Northern New Jersey.

The concentrations of these pharmaceuticals are tiny, measured in quantities of parts per billion or trillion, far below the levels of a medical dose. Utilities insist their water is safe.

Drugs enter the water supply when unused amounts of drugs are excreted into the toilet. And drugs from commercial livestock and pets also enter the water supply after excretion.

While researchers do not yet understand the exact risks from decades of persistent exposure to random combinations of low levels of pharmaceuticals, recent studies have found alarming effects on human cells and wildlife.

"We recognize it is a growing concern and we're taking it very seriously," said Benjamin H. Grumbles, assistant administrator for water at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The AP's investigation also indicates that watersheds, the natural sources of most of the nation's water supply, also are contaminated. Pharmaceuticals also permeate aquifers deep underground, source of 40 percent of the nation's water supply.

Even users of bottled water and home filtration systems don't necessarily avoid exposure. Bottlers, some of which simply repackage tap water, do not typically treat or test for pharmaceuticals, according to the industry's main trade group. The same goes for the makers of home filtration systems.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Phoenix's water was not tested as part of this AP investigation. According to the Arizona Republic edition of 03-14-08, both Phoenix and Scottsdale plan to initial testing of their drinking water for pharmaceutical medications. Other cities in the area are choosing to wait and see if the Federal Government tells us that the levels of pharmaceuticals are dangerous. I must confess that I am VERY glad I live in one of the cities which is choosing to be proactive about this potentially extremely dangerous issue.

Recent laboratory research has found that small amounts of medication have affected human embryonic kidney cells, human blood cells and human breast cancer cells. The cancer cells proliferated too quickly; the kidney cells grew too slowly; and the blood cells showed biological activity associated with inf